Women in the infantry -- The Effect on the Moral Domain.[1] Covers a lot of ground, with pro/con data points across multiple nations and several decades.
[2] Is about the Navy's struggle with the costs and effectiveness impacts of pregnancies.
Can gender-integrated work forces produce (whatever the metric is for "productivity" in a particular domain). Yes. Will management/leadership responsibilities be inherently more complicated? Yes. Does gender diversity inherently guarantee an objectively superior output? No. I think that it is domain/problem-set specific. Human intelligence (HUMINT)[3] and civ-mil ops[4] absolutely benefit from female integration in order to fully access 50% of the population. Especially important in a counter-insurgency context.
[1]https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a262478.pdf
[2]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/12/pregnant-na...
[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_intelligence_(intelligen...
Indeed: gender quotas and "positive" discrimination is both misogynistic.
You don't seem to value diversity of opinion that high, and expressing such opinions can be disastrous for one's career.
> Being unable to view female coworkers as you do any other coworker is misogynistic.
Sure, now what? There exists misogynistic people in the world, a lot of them in the workforce. That would imply that comment saying "men and women still don't work together" is at least worth consideration. You can't solve social issues by assigning a label.
Citations needed. I've never had any issues working with women, nor have I heard any coworkers or friends express this belief, or raise issues about working with members of the opposite gender. I don't think people aren't talking about this because it's "politically incorrect", but rather because most people (at least in Canada) simply don't have any issues working with members of the opposite gender.
Being unable to view female coworkers as you do any other coworker is misogynistic, whether it's intentional or not.