News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by ccffpphh on Friday October 18, 2019 @03:08AM (#21289272)
The Netherlands Bach Society has done an incredible job capturing his pieces, using stunning camerawork and high quality recordings. It’s such a pleasure.

https://youtu.be/74suFWTO8P0

Also frankly the harpsichord is a much better instrument for WTC Books 1&2, especially with the added focus on video. Something about it just speaks to the soul.

Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by jacquesm on Friday October 18, 2019 @03:17AM (#21289301)
> Also frankly the harpsichord is a much better instrument for WTC Books 1&2, especially with the added focus on video.

Maybe. Personally, I love listening to the harpischord but for limited periods of time whereas I can listen to piano all day long.

Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by tim333 on Friday October 18, 2019 @06:52AM (#21290236)
You kind of miss the variation in volume. I think Bach used harpischords partly for technical reasons - the piano hadn't been invented - and preferred the clavichord but that was too quiet for performing to many people.
Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by mastazi on Friday October 18, 2019 @10:19AM (#21291571)
Bach knew about pianos, he even worked as a “piano salesman” for a period of time

> Bach went on to become an agent for Silbermann, selling his pianos in Leipzig. There’s even a receipt signed by Bach on May 9, 1749, selling a “Piano et Forte” to a Polish count, Jan Casimir von Branitzky.

From https://notanothermusichistorycliche.blogspot.com/2016/07/di...

Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by jacquesm on Friday October 18, 2019 @11:11AM (#21292047)
Bach's criticism of Silbermann's earlier pianos led to substantial improvements.
Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by mastazi on Friday October 18, 2019 @11:50PM (#21296662)
Yes, he hated pianos when he first had the opportunity to try them. It is possible however that the first Silbermann prototypes, which is what he tried, were of low quality, even compared to other early pianos of the time. He certainly changed his opinion over time though and I agree with you that Silbermann must have listened to Bach’s early criticism. Anyway it is probable that Bach’s favourite keyboard instrument was the lute-harpsichord (see other link I posted in this thread).
Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by tim333 on Friday October 18, 2019 @11:25AM (#21292156)
Ah ok I got that a bit wrong. Though he would have been 64 at the time of sale and died a year after so I guess they were around in the later part of his life.
Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by mastazi on Friday October 18, 2019 @11:48PM (#21296659)
You didn’t get it completely wrong in the sense that piano was in its infancy at the time and nowhere near the capabilities and sonic features of modern pianos. So it is possible that when Bach wrote his “fur klavier” (“for keyboard instruments”) compositions, he didn’t have piano in mind. Probably his favourite keyboard instrument was the lute-harpsichord since he owned one https://baroquemusic.org/barluthp.html
Re:J.S. Bach the Rebel: The subversive practice of a canonic... by ccffpphh on Saturday October 19, 2019 @02:08PM (#21299833)
That's awesome. I'd never heard of the lute-harpsichord before, but the sound is great! The bass is so deep and mellow, but otherwise sounds pretty similar to a harpsichord. I love it, thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNYJirAcyJo