If you know F# you are going to feel a lot more comfortable than coming from say C/C++/C#.
The largest difference imo between F#/Ocaml and Haskell is the evaluation model where Haskell is lazy by default.
IMHO the largest difference is purity.
Not being able to mix IO and non-IO functions like this
print “Enter name:”
print (“Hello “ ++ readStdinLine ++ “!”)
Not really. You can mix them in Haskell too. Think of F# as Haskell except you are always working in the IO monad. Haskell doesn't require a "new way of writing IO code" at all. It just allows you to separate out the IO from the pure in a way that can be enforced by the compiler. But there is nothing preventing you from writing all Haskell code in the IO monad if you were so inclined - which is essentially OCaml/F#.
> Not really. You can mix them in Haskell too.
True, but it's not particularly syntactically convenient.
The entire point of monadic (do) syntax in Haskell is to make this convenient. I'm not following you exactly.
runeks mentioned
print “Enter name:”
print (“Hello “ ++ readStdinLine ++ “!”)
True, do notation does require you to add a line -
main = do
print "Enter name:"
name <- getLine
print ("Hello " ++ name ++ "!")
The surface similarities between haskell and F# are fairly clear - emphasis on pure functions, no parens and commas for function calls, etc.
Alexis King wrote an interesting comment on one reason haskell can be difficult to pick up, which might be one cause of the foreignness you've noticed: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/ddsvbk/you_are_alr...
How close is it to say something Like F# then? I've toyed with F# a bit and was able to pick it up pretty decently, but a lot of Haskell still looks foreign to me