News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index by TeMPOraL on Thursday October 17, 2019 @06:13AM (#21280454)
It does, because it competes with decarbonizations of things our civilization actually needs. Once that's done, it'll still be ridiculous to try and base the economy on bitcoins, because proof of work scales so badly it'll happily eat any and all energy that's made available.

Thousands of years from now, when humanity builds its first Dyson sphere, I would like to believe the collected energy will be used for purposes like making everyone's life long and prosperous, or propelling great starships across the void - and not just to secure the Bitcoin network.

Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index by Erlich_Bachman on Thursday October 17, 2019 @08:25AM (#21281250)
And you're just going to ignore that we can do layer 2 technologies like lightning network?
Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index by TeMPOraL on Thursday October 17, 2019 @08:47AM (#21281431)
Explain to me how they prevent the energy requirements of proof of work securing the entire cryptocoin infrastructure from growing significantly faster than the market using that infrastructure, and without compromising the whole reason behind cryptocurrencies in the first place, which is decentralization and lack of trust?
Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index by Erlich_Bachman on Thursday October 17, 2019 @09:13AM (#21281643)
Hm I'm not sure I understand, because the answer seems very simple: because they dramatically increase ratio of the number of meaningful transactions describing real economic activity to a MB of valueable block space (and therefore per watt of total global PoW calculation).
Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index by TeMPOraL on Thursday October 17, 2019 @09:28AM (#21281788)
If all they do is increase the ratio, that's only constant scaling. So in no way does it compensate for the scaling of PoW energy use with respect to market size.
Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index by Erlich_Bachman on Friday October 18, 2019 @04:29AM (#21289597)
Why would you assume it would be constant? What equations you are using? How exactly are you projecting the market size to POW increase, and how do you calculate L2 changes? "Increase" the ratio does not mean it will increase by *2, it can be ^2 or whatever other formula might end up being real.