News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by onlyrealcuzzo on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @02:16AM (#21267576)
Can you explain briefly how this could possibly take 3 years? I mean, I don't know anything about street design, but it seems so straightforward adding a protected bike lane. They aren't widening the streets, right? How could it take 3 years?
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by SECProto on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @07:30AM (#21269206)
So if you're just adding some painted bike lanes, or maybe some curb-separated bike lanes at street level, it shouldn't take anywhere near that long.

The situation I'm picturing where it could take a few years is if the bike lanes are raised up to the same level as the sidewalk. Which can take a long time because it means moving existing curbs, which means moving catchbasins (curbs direct water flow) and often light posts (should be near edge of road for accessibility purposes - maintaining clear walking path, having push buttons and audible signals at edge of street). Doing either or both of these things means stuff is getting moved around underground, and underground is a very busy place (sewer, water, natural gas, buried electrical, signal infrastructure, old foundations, ... And all these are at different depths, with different separation requirements, severally limiting what can go where). And add in a busy location like Market Street, and maintaining access all the time, and probably limiting working hours to minimize impact on residents/businesses. The time would add up fast.

Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @03:29AM (#21267960)
> They aren't widening the streets, right? How could it take 3 years?

There's no upper limit to how long you can take to do something.

Lower limits, sure, but no upper ones.