Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by semajian on Monday October 14, 2019 @11:52PM
(#21255404)
I've never come across a physicist who used the term "inertia" to refer to any of the common relativistic quantities.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by whatshisface on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @10:01AM
(#21258400)
I used the word "inertia" to refer to the various inertia-related things that are used in mechanics. For example, the mass tensor that appears in curvilinear coordinate systems. This class of inertia-related things are usually given a name involving the word mass, and they are not usually Lorentz invariant.
[dead]
Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by dang on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @05:05PM
(#21263755)
We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email [email protected] and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future.
Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by seanhunter on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @06:30AM
(#21257151)
a)I'm sure that's not true
b)I'm sure that's not a helpful comment in this context