Re:Work of renowned UK psychologist Hans Eysenck ruled ‘unsafe’
by karlh on Sunday October 13, 2019 @06:47PM
(#21243770)
It is the quality of the research methods used to support his ideas that are coming under fire. The fact that somebody published a study (or studies), even in well-respected journals, does not compensate for poor design. Likewise, poor design and unsupported conclusions in some studies does not automatically negate every other study a researcher has conducted. Designing, carrying out, and interpreting science is not something that can be done in headlines.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.