Re:Apple's list of 235 apps that are incompatible with macOS...
by snuxoll on Saturday October 12, 2019 @06:24PM
(#21236801)
Even though Linux distributions have been slowly dropping support for running on 32-bit systems nobody is talking about dropping 32-bit multilib support. The cost is primarily disk space, and Apple could just make 32-bit libraries an optional download.
Re:Apple's list of 235 apps that are incompatible with macOS...
by Aloha on Saturday October 12, 2019 @07:09PM
(#21237000)
Making CarbonLib an optional component several years ago would have made it clearer to users that "this is going away"
Re:Apple's list of 235 apps that are incompatible with macOS...
by scarface74 on Saturday October 12, 2019 @07:53PM
(#21237191)
“Users” don’t know what CarbonLib is. When Apple announced that they weren’t porting CarbonLib, developers knew.
Re:Apple's list of 235 apps that are incompatible with macOS...
by Aloha on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:06PM
(#21238072)
Users would have noticed when Application X stopped working unless they downloaded this thing that the download page for makes very clear will be unsupported in 2 years.
Re:Apple's list of 235 apps that are incompatible with macOS...
by scarface74 on Sunday October 13, 2019 @09:44AM
(#21240299)
Do you really think any app developer would ask the users to download a dll from the web to make their app work? They would jusr bundle it like installers bundle the Java runtime or Windows apps bundle the compatible version of msvcrt32.dll
But IMO, Apple should have removed Carbon last year (six years after deprecation). That would have made the removal of 32-bit Cocoa a bit less traumatic.