I have the opposite experience. I use FF on all my computers and mobile, and when I sit behind some other dev's Chrome the tools are simply atrocious. Maybe it's not the quality that is different, but the way we use the tools? I might have "aligned" myself with FF, as you (and many others) have with Chrome.
I mean if I press Cmd+P to look up a source file and Firefox doesn't suggest the source mapped one before the ES5 compiled one, it's already beyond me how I should ever seriously work with that tooling. It's just a matter of speed and convenience. But my workflows of course might differ from what others do.
With quality I was referring to the actual code quality of Firefox, not so much the interface. See my post below about DOM events changing order when debugging. My instinct just tells me that something is deeply wrong under the hood if something like this can even happen.
One basic feature that is missing for e.g. is that one cannot open a file using the syntax filename:line:column in the source editor. You will need to navigate the line number manually after opening the file.
Personally I like SeaMonkey as it is community build Mozilla. Many of the "features" have settings in preferences.
It seems to me that the Mozilla Foundation is pushing the project in some weird spots(DoH) and while not ad revenue based, they do take money from companies.
Notice the Search Provides list? Who uses Ebay as their primary search provides? Heck who wants to search from the URL bar.
Otter-Browser is making great strides and I use it on untrusted sites. Please make the browser simple and not hide settings in about:config.
Me? I love this feature.
You've gone too far.
F6 + query + Enter ftw. D: It's how I've always done it.
potential "10,000,000+ users" pissed at Google is the reason, but why if we made it look like extension author was dodgy/to blame? ... :(
because they weren't dominant in the market, and it was a feature the market leading browers supported
now they are dominant they can throw their weight around
Yeah, that feature is a must. /s
Saying "quality" doesn't actually mean anything. What exactly is "quality" in this case?
It looks as if they misused the community's products and trust to build their monopoly and then kick us out once it's gotten hard enough to compete.
Perhaps this is a good thing in the long run, because now people will finally have to switch and maybe contribute to improving Firefox.
I am hopeful, but also I must say in my opinion Firefox is nowhere near Chrome when comparing performance, developer tooling and quality.