News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by phasnox on Saturday October 12, 2019 @10:08AM (#21233217)
I'd try Brave.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by mdtusz on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:16AM (#21233779)
If you're a vim user, try qutebrowser. It has some quirks, but with the ability to customize keyboard shortcuts and call upon scripts it's hard to move back to a "normal" browser.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by SomeOtherThrow on Saturday October 12, 2019 @10:32AM (#21233418)
Brave looks really cool, but it uses chromium so its hands are forever tied to google. I remember they considered Gecko but rejected it for some reason.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by codehalo on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:46AM (#21234023)
I don't understand that logic. It's a fork. Is Webkit tied to KHTML? Is gcc tied to egcs?
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by SomeOtherThrow on Saturday October 12, 2019 @12:26PM (#21234321)
Chromium is not a fork of chrome. AFAIK brave has not forked chromium.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by yoasif_ on Saturday October 12, 2019 @06:04PM (#21236692)
> AFAIK brave has not forked chromium.

Yes they have. They had their own browser previously but have since given up on that. https://github.com/brave/brave-browser

Chromium is listed right on the readme.

Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by phasnox on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:07AM (#21233709)
Yeahp I wish they could decouple from it.

What we really need is an alternative to the official Chrome Web Store.