News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fibers aren’t useful for much any more.

Re:Fibers aren’t useful for much any more by dang on Friday October 11, 2019 @10:45PM (#21230286)
Some of the comments refer to the paper at http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p136..., which was the original submitted URL.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fibers aren’t useful for much any more by erusset on Saturday October 12, 2019 @08:29AM (#21232503)
There are also (at least) two relevant followups to this paper:

Response to “Fibers under the magnifying glass”: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p086...

Response to response to "Fibers under the magnifying glass": http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p152...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fibers aren’t useful for much any more by johannkokos on Saturday October 12, 2019 @09:34AM (#21232982)
"Response to 'Fibers under the magnifying glass'" from the authors of boost.fiber, at

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p086....

And Response to response to "Fibers under the magnifying glass", at

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p152...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fibers aren’t useful for much any more by gpderetta on Saturday October 12, 2019 @10:45AM (#21233526)
The saga of stackful corutines vs stackless coroutines Vs zero overhead coroutines has been going on in C++ land for a while now.

Gor so far seems to be ahead as stackless coroutines are part of the standard.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fibers aren’t useful for much any more by barrkel on Saturday October 12, 2019 @06:00AM (#21231852)
This is deeply weird for the conversation, IMO this should have been two separate stories.
[ Parent | on HN ]