News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by treelovinhippie on Friday October 11, 2019 @09:28PM (#21229907)
Since there was never a public token sale (as it was all raised privately) they should have just done a debt/equity raise. What was the point in doing an ICO?

Though like all of these private token sales, it's a great way for crypto whales to multiply their imaginary wealth without having to exit to fiat and pay taxes.

Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by shanecoin on Friday October 11, 2019 @09:32PM (#21229938)
To take advantage of the ICO hype. Telegram could never have raised $1.7B in different, more traditional medium.
Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by treelovinhippie on Friday October 11, 2019 @09:34PM (#21229949)
I dunno, someone like Softbank would have happily thrown that their way.
Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by elchupanebre on Saturday October 12, 2019 @04:51AM (#21231583)
It's unlikely that one Ponzi scheme will invest into another.
Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by SahAssar on Monday October 14, 2019 @02:15PM (#21251151)
Without any equity and preferred shares? no.
Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by wmf on Friday October 11, 2019 @10:12PM (#21230144)
The point is that the investors could dump their tokens onto clueless FOMOers on public exchanges. That doesn't work with traditional equity investment (see WeWork IPO).
Re:SEC halts Telegram's $1.7B token offering by elchupanebre on Saturday October 12, 2019 @04:50AM (#21231581)
They already raised $1.7B (and spent a good chunk of it, $280M by Jan 31 2019, probably $0.5B by now). Those who gave them money need a grater fool to buy the tokens from them. Otherwise the fun cannot continue. Someone will have to pay.

> without having to exit to fiat

Last time I checked one cannot buy yachts and private jets for crypto.