Re:String Theory Does Not Win a Nobel, and I Win a Long Bet
by meowface on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @04:44PM
(#21207835)
There are still a lot of prominent, respectable theoretical physicists who work on string theory. Leonard Susskind, for example. While no evidence of it has been found so far, is calling it "Noodle Theory" and a bunch of baloney really fair? There are plenty of big theories for which there's no evidence, but that doesn't necessarily mean we're certain yet that they're pseudoscience or unfalsifiable. Supersymmetry, Many Worlds, etc.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:String Theory Does Not Win a Nobel, and I Win a Long Bet
by kelnos on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @06:42PM
(#21208975)
IMO calling it "noodle theory" is just a juvenile means to make fun of people who study it. If you want to tell people something is wrong, tell them why; don't invent childish names to put other people down by association.
Re:String Theory Does Not Win a Nobel, and I Win a Long Bet
by jessriedel on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @04:47PM
(#21207864)
I don't think Susskind works on string theory proper at all anymore. He works on the AdS/CFT stuff, which is compatible with and motivated by stringy approaches, but is logically quite independent. Related: https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6252