Re:China attacks Apple for allowing Hong Kong crowdsourced p...
by reaperducer on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @01:43PM
(#21205728)
It's not surprising that two different organizations would have two different headlines. That's common sense, not a conspiracy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China attacks Apple for allowing Hong Kong crowdsourced p...
by La1n on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @02:05PM
(#21206022)
NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/09/world/asia/china-apple-nb...
Even the same organisation. Still not a conspiracy but as a non US citizen it's clear that a lot of the US media doesn't treat China the same as the US. I am sure it's like that in every country, but that makes it difficult to find objective news, or at least news that doesn't have an emotional charge to it.
Re:China attacks Apple for allowing Hong Kong crowdsourced p...
by wavefunction on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @02:08PM
(#21206054)
Websites will a/b test different headlines to drive visitors to the articles and revise them during the course of the day to play off subsequent developments.
The reason they inject emotion into the headlines is because that's what people want.
Re:China attacks Apple for allowing Hong Kong crowdsourced p...
by La1n on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @02:14PM
(#21206133)
Oh I fully agree and I think that's terrible. It's awful in my opinion that a news organisation cares more about their income and what people want to hear, than what is objective news.