Re:macOS Catalina
by AlexeyBrin on Monday October 07, 2019 @02:59PM
(#21184646)
Unless you have a very powerful host system running macOS in a VM is painfully slow. On a 2019 MacBook Air with 16GB or RAM running a virtualized macOS is crawling to render the Finder window.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:macOS Catalina
by kitsunesoba on Monday October 07, 2019 @04:29PM
(#21185609)
The biggest problem with virtualizing macOS is that it’s built assuming that a half competent GPU is available, meaning that its software rasterizer is dog slow which is a big problem because no VM simulates a GPU that macOS supports. I’ve heard things about getting GPU passthrough working to fix this but I’ve not tried that myself.
Re:macOS Catalina
by Wowfunhappy on Monday October 07, 2019 @03:09PM
(#21184747)
Parallels specifically is much better than e.g. Virtualbox in my experience. Still not really pleasant—there's a lot of latency for some reason, unless you directly pass through the mouse as a USB device—but usable enough.
I still think I'd rather dual boot though.
Re:macOS Catalina
by userbinator on Monday October 07, 2019 @09:52PM
(#21187903)
A few months ago I tried a Mojave and a few older versions of macOS in VirtualBox on a 2013 Thinkpad (Hackintosh) and had no problems with booting nor basic things like Finder and other operations with the GUI. I didn't try more graphics-intensive apps, however, but it was actually surprisingly fast and easy to install from an ISO created using the official source download, minus the workaround I needed for EFI booting from APFS. Building an app with Xcode (the reason for doing all this in the first place) also worked decently.