News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by pabl0rg on Saturday October 05, 2019 @09:32PM (#21169232)
I’m surprised the Economist doesn’t know ARM is British!
Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by chrisseaton on Sunday October 06, 2019 @04:07PM (#21174738)
It isn't anymore - it became Japanese a couple of years ago.
Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by ksec on Sunday October 06, 2019 @05:52PM (#21175428)
Chris, would you still consider, Jaguar, Bentley, Land Rover British?

Because I think ownerships changes with time, but most of these brand, thinking, management are still very much British.

Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by chrisseaton on Sunday October 06, 2019 @05:57PM (#21175448)
But this isn't an article about corporate culture - it's an article about the nationality of the company which owns the IP.

> are built around designs, known as instruction-set architectures (isas), which are owned either by Intel, an American giant, or by Arm, a Japanese one

Who owns the ARM IP? A Japanese company. Not a British one.

If you asked me if ARM has a British history and possibly culture, then yes (it certainly pays like a British company!) But that wasn't the context - the context was who effectively owns the IP.

So what do you think is more likely? The Economist are mistaken about the history of the company, or they were using a different context, the one they actually make explicit in the article?

Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by ksec on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:42AM (#21179307)
I was just wondering from a British Point of view whether you still consider them to be British or not.

>Who owns the ARM IP? A Japanese company. Not a British one.

ARM, a British Company, owned by Japanese Funds.

Because to me that is like saying HSBC is owned by Chinese if HSBC had Ping An and other shadow investors owning majority of it, but certainly HSBC is a British Company right?

P.S - I means no offence in case any Brits got the wrong end of the stick. Just genuinely curious.

Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by chrisseaton on Monday October 07, 2019 @02:54PM (#21184584)
> I was just wondering from a British Point of view whether you still consider them to be British or not.

I think they're culturally British. I don't think they are British owned or that their IP is British owned. Which was the context of the discussion.

Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by NeedMoreTea on Sunday October 06, 2019 @06:02PM (#21175471)
Mostly no. They may be based in the UK, but the decisions of whether to introduce a new range, hiring, firing and where profits go lie elsewhere.

The Land Rover office may still look and feel British, but it's Tata gets the final say, and perhaps one day decides they will all be made in India. Or perhaps Poland post no-deal Brexit.

Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by SmellyGeekBoy on Monday October 07, 2019 @07:03AM (#21179435)
JLR are already moving a lot of production to Slovenia and China, FWIW.
Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by SmellyGeekBoy on Monday October 07, 2019 @07:02AM (#21179429)
No. The MINI isn't British either (they're great cars though).
Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by xiaodai on Saturday October 05, 2019 @09:37PM (#21169254)
Bought by softbank
Re:RISC V: A new blueprint for microprocessors challenges th... by CalChris on Sunday October 06, 2019 @12:05AM (#21169760)
With major design centers in Austin (A76) and Sophia-Antipolis (A53) as well as Cambridge.