News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by altxwally on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @07:09AM (#2115484)
What I like the most about Org syntax is that it gives you a framework to plan your tasks by using nothing but text. For example:

- [%] Task 1

+ [X] Task a

+ [ ] Task b //C-c on this task will check this an calculate the %

+ [ ] Task c

Plus, it has comments. I haven't researched enough but I cannot remember of any other syntax that has comments.

# Fix this paragraph later...

* Why I like Org syntax

When you export this to latex, post it to wordpress or with org2blog, etc... the comments won't be shown. Very useful.

Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by rwl on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @11:03AM (#2116203)
For those unfamiliar: these are awesome, but pretty basic, features of Org. In addition to a plain-text syntax for outlining and making lists (for tasks or otherwise), Org syntax offers:

- tags

- properties (key/value pairs that can affect things like export behavior, but also have their own API)

- dates, timestamps, ranges of these, and repeating dates/timestamps, as well as more complicated complicated scheduling via integration with Emacs diary (e.g., a class that meets every Monday from January until May)

- per-file configuration variables (e.g., configure your TODO workflow in a given file to be: TODO -> INPROGRESS -> WAITING -> DONE)

- priority of TODO items

- hyperlinks to local documents, URLs, emails, address book entries, etc.

and more. I'm just listing the syntax I use. And this is to say nothing of Org's many great features beyond its syntax, like the capture interface, the publishing framework, and the many useful exporters.

Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by punchagan on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @07:28AM (#2115523)
ReST does support comments.
Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by mise on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @09:41AM (#2115926)
Not bad. That's how I keep my todo lists, after having quit Basecamp:

  IDEAS
    One Idea
    And another idea
  
  TODO TODAY
    A task

  ARCHIVE
    Old tasks just pasted here
Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by jfm3 on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @09:04AM (#2115786)
Article should be titled "I like Org better than ReST".
Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by punchagan on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @09:18AM (#2115840)
agreed.
Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @11:44AM (#2116406)
I'm not so sure about the thesis of the blog post, I haven't used org very much. But ReST is so much better than the dominant wiki syntaxes in the Ruby world, it's not even funny. ReST actually had significant effort put into it's design, whereas Markdown was a quick hack Gruber designed just for himself and "thrown over the fence". Even so, it's better than the other common one, textile.

http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/peps/pep-0287.html

Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by ZoFreX on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @08:59AM (#2115765)
What the hell is org? As a standalone blog post this left me more confused than anything else.
Re:Why Org is better than ReST (& other markup) by kols on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @09:14AM (#2115824)
This is org, or orgmode: http://orgmode.org/