Re:Attorney General will ask Zuckerberg to halt plans for en...
by danShumway on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:11PM
(#21151595)
> I'm asking what's the nuance in privacy vs crime prevention.
This is the whole problem. There _is_ nuance. Users can still report content, even if it's private. Automated detection systems can still run client-side. Public forums like Facebook itself are still targetable, and we can increase funding and counseling for moderators in those public spaces to reduce turnover.
Barr is the one here saying that, "mere numbers" aren't enough to talk about the problem. How exactly are we supposed to compromise with that? What exactly is a 'nuanced' response to the argument that any system that allows even one child to be abused is unacceptable?
Barr isn't going to be happy unless law enforcement can read every single message. And he's going to trot out the same arguments every single time. And every time we respond, somebody is going to be jumping in to say, "but why can't we just have a little nuance? Why are all of you so dogmatic about this?"
This is the whole problem. There _is_ nuance. Users can still report content, even if it's private. Automated detection systems can still run client-side. Public forums like Facebook itself are still targetable, and we can increase funding and counseling for moderators in those public spaces to reduce turnover.
Barr is the one here saying that, "mere numbers" aren't enough to talk about the problem. How exactly are we supposed to compromise with that? What exactly is a 'nuanced' response to the argument that any system that allows even one child to be abused is unacceptable?
Barr isn't going to be happy unless law enforcement can read every single message. And he's going to trot out the same arguments every single time. And every time we respond, somebody is going to be jumping in to say, "but why can't we just have a little nuance? Why are all of you so dogmatic about this?"