News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:After discovering he has at least 17 kids, man sues ferti... by buboard on Thursday October 03, 2019 @03:43PM (#21151243)
i really don't see why. back then there was no IVF and donor sperm would be a way for good old fashioned conservative couples who cant conceive to have the children they always wanted
Re:After discovering he has at least 17 kids, man sues ferti... by apta on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:41PM (#21151947)
A conservative couple won't use a sperm donor. The woman will literally be carrying another man's child, not her husband's.
Re:After discovering he has at least 17 kids, man sues ferti... by buboard on Thursday October 03, 2019 @07:00PM (#21153165)
What makes you say so? They wouldn't adopt a kid too? I don't think it's a "left" issue at all for couples. For single mothers, maybe
Re:After discovering he has at least 17 kids, man sues ferti... by apta on Friday October 04, 2019 @10:35AM (#21158118)
Adoption is different if done properly. The adopted child should not in anyway be implied or declared to be of the same bloodline as the adopting parents, otherwise we'll end up with the same issue seen here. It's also important that the child know that they're adopted from early on, and not hide that fact.

Whereas artificial insemination is literally having the woman carry another man's child, it goes against conservative values (would they let another man sleep with the woman to impregnate her if there weren't artificial insemination?)