Re:Big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS
by antisemiotic on Wednesday October 02, 2019 @07:21AM
(#21135224)
Do you also browse the web through a daemon that emails you pages, Stallman-style?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS
by mirimir on Wednesday October 02, 2019 @07:35AM
(#21135302)
I'm not sure that I see the point. I mean, the daemon would need to run somewhere. And it'd need to render stuff. I guess that there'd be less going on, so less that's exploitable.
But no, I haven't done that.
I mainly depend on compartmentalization. This VM runs on a host that contains no information about my meatspace identity. And the machine with that information is on a different LAN.
Edit: But upon reflection, I have done something like that. Sometimes I run remote dedicated servers. Accessed via Tor (via nested VPNs) and paid with well-mixed Bitcoin. With LUKS and dropbear, of course.
If I run VirtualBox, I can basically do the same thing I do locally. I use pfSense VMs as VPN gateways, to create nested VPN chains. And then Whonix instances, which hit Tor through those VPNs. And I access the remote VMs via VRDP via SSH via Tor etc.
Re:Big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS
by ParadigmaShift on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:07PM
(#21151544)
I do, and it all goes over nested VPNs/Tor, but my solution is different than the one mirimir uses.