Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by brazzledazzle on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @12:56AM
(#21122165)
People actually bike shed over .yaml vs .yml? If you thought tabs vs spaces was a useless debate...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by pixelbash on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @02:05AM
(#21122459)
Never been comfortable with extension names longer than 3 letters long for some reason..
Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by wazoox on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @03:40AM
(#21122919)
MS-DOS. The reason is MS-DOS.
Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by hendi_ on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @04:08AM
(#21123110)
Thank you for the EXPLAN~1!
Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by XJ6 on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @04:42AM
(#21123296)
If anyone's curious this references the 8.3 filename shortening that windows was even still doing recently.
Amusingly, that tiny bit of backward compatibility can lead to vulnerabilities as outlined here: https://www.acunetix.com/blog/articles/windows-short-8-3-fil...
Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by tomatocracy on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @10:44AM
(#21125827)
It goes back further than that - DOS got the idea of 8.3 filenames from CP/M and before that DEC used three letter file extensions on its minicomputer operating systems. The idea arguably goes back even further into the mainframes of the 1960s although it gets a bit messier then to trace it.
Re:Processing 40TB of code from 10M projects with a dedicate...
by EdwardDiego on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @04:39AM
(#21123286)
All I'm saying mate, is that we don't pronounce it Yiml now, do we. :D