News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Out here, it’s just me’: one doctor for 11,000 square miles by rayiner on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:34PM (#21120659)
The story flips if you use the Supplemental Poverty Measure, which adjusts for cost of living: https://www.irp.wisc.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Focus.... Rural poverty has consistently been similar to urban poverty, and was measurably lower during the great recession. Rural areas also have lower long-term poverty (where a family was poor for two successive measurement years). About 4% in 2016 for rural areas, versus 5.5% in urban areas.

The states with the lowest SPM poverty rates are midwestern states with large rural populations, like Iowa and Nebraska: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territ.... (California's poverty rate is almost double those states'.)

Re:‘Out here, it’s just me’: one doctor for 11,000 square miles by haimez on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:42PM (#21120704)
Sure, but during a recession no one is moving into those areas and a LOT of unemployed are moving AWAY from them. The metrics look good because they misrepresent what’s actually happening.
Re:‘Out here, it’s just me’: one doctor for 11,000 square miles by rayiner on Monday September 30, 2019 @08:07PM (#21120830)
Actually the opposite is true: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/90556/eib-200..... There was a significant rural to urban net migration during boom economies which slowed to zero during both the early 2000s recession and the 2008 recession. And in fact there was a small migration from urban back to rural during the last recession.

The unemployment rate in Iowa peaked at a little more than half the national unemployment rate in 2009-2010.

Re:‘Out here, it’s just me’: one doctor for 11,000 square miles by HeadsUpHigh on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @09:13AM (#21124930)
That's objectively and measurably false.