News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by CathedralBorrow on Monday September 30, 2019 @08:17AM (#21114460)
That's certainly a link you've made. Any thoughts on the first quote? The one where he writes "I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children". Do you think he's just factually summarizing some news article there as well?
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by makomk on Monday September 30, 2019 @08:24AM (#21114522)
Presumably that was his actual views back then. People have relied heavily on that second quote to prove that he still holds those views though.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by foldr on Monday September 30, 2019 @11:06AM (#21116114)
If he hasn't very publicly retracted that view and apologized (and: he hasn't), then he shouldn't be surprised that people aren't willing to give him the benefit of the doubt when he talks about sex crimes.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by flukus on Monday September 30, 2019 @08:25PM (#21120913)
> If he hasn't very publicly retracted that view and apologized (and: he hasn't)

Except he has (https://www.stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html):

> 14 September 2019 (Sex between an adult and a child is wrong) Many years ago I posted that I could not see anything wrong about sex between an adult and a child, if the child accepted it. Through personal conversations in recent years, I've learned to understand how sex with a child can harm per psychologically. This changed my mind about the matter: I think adults should not do that. I am grateful for the conversations that enabled me to understand why.

Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by foldr on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @02:22AM (#21122528)
That was only posted after he came under pressure, and contains no apology.