News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to com... by semi-extrinsic on Monday September 30, 2019 @12:38AM (#21111816)
If we're going to start using power to create liquids to burn again ("power-to-X-to-power") why not make those liquids carbon-free?

Hydrogen is one option. Ammonia is another. Both can be burnt in engines, and have zero CO2 emissions.

Re:Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to com... by PaulAJ on Monday September 30, 2019 @03:42AM (#21112661)
Hydrogen has huge practical problems with storage. Ammonia is an interesting idea, but direct combustion isn't practical due to NOx emissions and low temperature, and ammonia fuel cells are still at the lab prototype stage. The toxicity of ammonia is also an issue.
Re:Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to com... by readams on Monday September 30, 2019 @12:42AM (#21111828)
It is carbon neutral to make hydrocarbons and then burn then as long as the energy source for making them is carbon neutral. The hydrocarbons have the advantage of far higher energy density, which makes them much better as fuels.
Re:Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to com... by black_puppydog on Monday September 30, 2019 @02:49AM (#21112355)
More energy efficient maybe. But I'd much prefer a city where every of the (hopefully few) car/scooter engines is either electric, or the exhaust spews water vapor.
Re:Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to com... by hkeide on Monday September 30, 2019 @03:32AM (#21112609)
Plugin hybrids would solve a lot of this problem. Battery can be ten times smaller and no range anxiety for much of the same benefits as fully electric