Re:Why Google is not winning in Russia - and unexpected sear...
by TomorrowMars on Sunday January 16, 2011 @05:30PM
(#2110466)
You raise a very interesting point. Just because a lot of American companies draw a large amount of income from abroad does not make them respect the market or adjust the product to that market. IN fact, US imperialist policy (and that is simply what it is, don't take me for a rebel commie, but a country that has been at offensive war for most of it's history cannot be named anything but an imperialist) has insured that other countries are force fed American products, right after we liberize them, as in liberate for immediate colonisation.
Re:Why Google is not winning in Russia - and unexpected sear...
by anamax on Monday January 17, 2011 @01:51AM
(#2111446)
> country that has been at offensive war for most of it's history cannot be named anything but an imperialist
Actually, it can.
The fact that both offensive war and imperialism are bad does not mean that they're the same.
If you can't distinguish between different evils and confuse them, how do we know that you can identify evils?
In other news, imperialism is not colonialism.
Perhaps the problem isn't quite as fundamental (non-English NLP sucks) but has more to do with secondary Locale handling in specific countries?
Interesting observation on US-centricity (is that a word?) nonetheless. Many major US Corps derive > 50% rev from outside of US. Not sure if GOOG is one of those.