Perhaps the problem isn't quite as fundamental (non-English NLP sucks) but has more to do with secondary Locale handling in specific countries?
Interesting observation on US-centricity (is that a word?) nonetheless. Many major US Corps derive > 50% rev from outside of US. Not sure if GOOG is one of those.
Actually, it can.
The fact that both offensive war and imperialism are bad does not mean that they're the same.
If you can't distinguish between different evils and confuse them, how do we know that you can identify evils?
In other news, imperialism is not colonialism.
Also slightly off-topic: I appreciate that English isn't the author's first language, but, wow, that was painful to read. I feel his point might come across a bit stronger without sentences like "Or perhaps a painkiller should be administered to dispense the suffering of google as we strike with the mercykill?" or "Perhaps it is time for google to crash down on the matress of bitter disappointment as well, a la black swan."
I can't help but think using the Swedish Google to search for Russian is hardly a perfect example of science here.
Why isn't he using google.ru? I have no idea if it would return different results, but his current article doesn't prove as much as he thinks it does.
(Although, Library of Congress? Seriously?)