News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House Weighs Limits on U.S. Portfolio Flows Into China by narag on Saturday September 28, 2019 @06:01AM (#21099480)
No matter who's in charge in each moment, the West should try to convince China that it must transition to a political system like ours if they want to keep dealing with us.

Allowing China to maintain its tyrannic regime is extremely dangerous for everybody in the long run.

The change doesn't need to be abrupt and it's possible to make some assurances for people currently in power.

Not that it worked so well with Russia, I know.

Re:White House Weighs Limits on U.S. Portfolio Flows Into China by jacquesm on Saturday September 28, 2019 @10:11AM (#21100367)
The only way such change can be enforced without a war is from inside.
Re:White House Weighs Limits on U.S. Portfolio Flows Into China by narag on Saturday September 28, 2019 @01:43PM (#21101719)
"Enforced" is not the word I was looking for. More like showing the ruling class that it's in their own interest to gradually apply some changes. There are many obstacles for such a strategy. But even if there isn't a clear path, there needs to be some factors in place for somebody inside to invent that path. If nothing is ever done, nothing will change.
Re:White House Weighs Limits on U.S. Portfolio Flows Into China by filoleg on Saturday September 28, 2019 @01:09PM (#21101501)
I mean, isn’t that exactly the whole point of sanctions, to make people on the inside to feel the effects and do something about it from within?
Re:White House Weighs Limits on U.S. Portfolio Flows Into China by jacquesm on Saturday September 28, 2019 @04:24PM (#21102649)
That's the theory. The practice is the rulers will use the sanctions to prove to their people that the outside world is mean and evil and their only hope lies in their dear leaders.