Unfortunately, when "health insurance" covers day to day conditions, procedures, etc and costs the same for everyone regardless of circumstances, then it's no longer "insurance" but effectively pre-paying for access to a set of services.. and hopefully, it's services that you want and might actually need.
In the US, it's more of a "healthcare access fee" than "health insurance."
The numbers are subject to some debate, eg the arguments over the Mercatus Medicare For All paper, but hand waving and claiming insurance that covers day to day procedures isn’t actually insurance is dubious. Not to mention, many modern plans have high-deductibles and function as you suggest, to where a healthy person may receive little covered service but also pay less out of pocket.
https://www.amsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CaseForUHC.p...
That may cause policy changes if people's mindset and behavior shift but at least we're building on better models of the world.
If patients had an option - a la you can get an appointment now with an external consultant for $X, or wait two weeks - then that would make sense. But instead you pay for health insurance to literally insure against catastrophically expensive health-care costs (that's the point of insurance - "socialize" risk so that the individual doesn't get "wiped out" in case of an extraordinary event), yet you may still go bankrupt even if you do everything right!
Also, most other countries have a two-tiered system. Public health insurance, possibly worse and slower (don't necessarily agree), or you pay extra for private health insurance and get nicer hospital suits, better doctors and short wait times.