Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by zaroth on Friday September 27, 2019 @03:35PM
(#21095518)
Is that what’s responsible for it smelling like swamp water? I always heard that somehow “algae bloom” was to blame, but there were certain days the San Jose tap water would be pungent.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by 4ntonius8lock on Friday September 27, 2019 @03:32PM
(#21095493)
Is this something that would be removed with common cheap consumer filters? (such as Britta)
I drink a lot of tap water, but always put it through a filter of some sort.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by _0ffh on Friday September 27, 2019 @04:01PM
(#21095741)
If you don't mind a bit of work (weekly rinsing) and discarding part of the water, I'd recommend a reverse osmosis filter. They're reasonably cheap and beat the crap out of all the alternatives for non-professional users. You'll essentially have to add back some salts after the filtration process to turn it into something that won't demineralise you.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by mdorazio on Friday September 27, 2019 @04:07PM
(#21095782)
Took some poking around to piece together a real answer, but the ion exchange component in a standard Brita filter (or similar pour-through) isn't the right kind to trap chromium (mostly just zinc, copper, and cadmium). You either need a higher-grade ion exchange filter (you can search for "Chromium 6 Water Filter" on Amazon) or a reverse osmosis system.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by 4ntonius8lock on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @12:37PM
(#21127433)
Thanks. Reverse osmosis removes minerals, which isn't something I want. Personally (this is just my perspective) I operate under the theory we don't fully understand the human body, so don't mess with things too much, removing minerals and then selectively adding some back in is not something I think we are well informed enough to do without possible negative consequences.
I looked for Chromium 6 Water Filter and found plenty of good options. Truly thank you for the recommendation.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by groby_b on Friday September 27, 2019 @03:48PM
(#21095635)
I honestly don't know. IIRC, you need an ion exchange filter (but they're bad for other reasons) or a reverse osmosis one certified for Cr(VI).
https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/ has a pretty decent guide.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by ChuckMcM on Friday September 27, 2019 @06:41PM
(#21096917)
I think that is overly alarmist. These guys: https://torrentlab.com/drinking-and-storm-water-quality-test... make it easy to get a water test done.
If you're worried about chromium 6 (hexavalent chromium) install a reverse osmosis filter.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by outworlder on Friday September 27, 2019 @04:49PM
(#21096139)
> If you live e.g. in the Bay Area, your tap water instead has a good chance of having a good helping of hexavalent chromium
And tastes like crap across the bay. I don't care, but my wife is pretty picky about it. I've tried multiple filters, to no avail.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by jacobolus on Friday September 27, 2019 @04:47PM
(#21096120)
San Francisco water mostly comes from the Tuolumne River (Hetch Hetchy reservoir).
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by mc32 on Friday September 27, 2019 @05:03PM
(#21096278)
I don’t think SJC gets if from Hetchhechy nor east bay mud, but I may be misinformed.
Upon searching looks like SJC gets if from aquifers, recharge areas and also a bit from sfpuc (hetchhechy). EB MUD gets it from the Sierra snowmelt.
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by _jal on Friday September 27, 2019 @09:09PM
(#21097690)
If you want to actually look up your local results from the source of that article,
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by seppin on Saturday September 28, 2019 @01:10AM
(#21098577)
And what exactly can one do if the results are terrible?
Re:Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in glo...
by _jal on Sunday September 29, 2019 @04:13PM
(#21109366)
Depending on specific circumstance: buy filters, find alternate sources, move.
If you live e.g. in the Bay Area, your tap water instead has a good chance of having a good helping of hexavalent chromium[1], which... not too healthy. (Neither are arsenic, bromium, etc.)
Pick your poison. Literally.
[1] https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Tap-water-Bay-Area-datab...