News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA Wants to Send Nuclear Rockets to the Moon and Mars by Bud on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:40AM (#21093133)
Um, uh, um, uh...where to start?

"Mined" from where? How?

Re:NASA Wants to Send Nuclear Rockets to the Moon and Mars by ianai on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:43AM (#21093186)
The moon? Asteroids? Or even just ship up unrefined ore such that a catastrophic failure can’t threaten the population.
Re:NASA Wants to Send Nuclear Rockets to the Moon and Mars by mitchty on Friday September 27, 2019 @02:33PM (#21094874)
Neither of the first two are options... at all realistically, nither uranium nor thorium exist in anything below a large planetary size body in any quantity: https://www.quora.com/Do-uranium-and-thorium-exist-in-signif...

And shipping up unrefined ore is also a bit of a ludicrous idea for mass reasons and the rocket equation alone. You do realize you can isolate a nuclear reactor core from explosions on rockets right? What catastrophic failures are you attempting to design your solution of avoiding a nuclear reactor around?

Re:NASA Wants to Send Nuclear Rockets to the Moon and Mars by cblades on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:51AM (#21093279)
What risks make that extraordinary cost worthwhile?
Re:NASA Wants to Send Nuclear Rockets to the Moon and Mars by BAReF00t on Friday September 27, 2019 @12:01PM (#21093386)
The moon's dust contains huge amounts of helium-3.

Which apparently is an amazing power source.

Also, why fission? We do have working fusion reactors. They are called hydrogen bombs. (The outer part, at least.) As long as you can keep the G forces low ...

Re:NASA Wants to Send Nuclear Rockets to the Moon and Mars by JumpCrisscross on Friday September 27, 2019 @01:06PM (#21093992)
> Which apparently is an amazing power source

Theoretically, for reactors we don't have.