News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project by zzzcpan on Friday September 27, 2019 @10:38AM (#21092468)
> > It's not my fault if she is a nobody (she really is) that builds weapons for the US military (she really does)

> What does any of that have to do with what she said?

Person with questionable morals [1] making moral judgement claims suggests that the whole thing was manufactured. I wouldn't even exclude a possibility that she received some money to publish the things that she did.

[1] as her career choice clearly shows she has no problem with wars, which are known to cause death, including death of children, actual rape of young girls, organ harvesting and pretty much anything awful you can think of in this world wars have

Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project by cptskippy on Friday September 27, 2019 @10:47AM (#21092574)
She worked on the guidance systems for an autonomous ground vehicle for the DoD that's basically a proof of concept at this point.

We're equating that to war monger?

Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project by curryst on Friday September 27, 2019 @04:14PM (#21095848)
As was the atomic bomb at one point in time. There may be exceptions for unintended uses of the technology you develop (a la Alfred Nobel), but there's not a lot of wiggle room when you work for the DoD.

You were hired to develop things that will eventually be used to kill people. That's the end goal of the job. Whether you make anything usable or not is somewhat beside the point, the intention is still there.

Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project by lostjohnny on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:07AM (#21092788)
> war monger

war mongers become war mongers one drone at the time.

Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project by mosdl on Friday September 27, 2019 @01:50PM (#21094436)
How many people were killed by tech that uses FSF code? Quite a lot I bet...