Re:Gatsby raises $15M Series A for its modern web developmen...
by innocentoldguy on Friday September 27, 2019 @08:53AM
(#21091339)
I can’t speak for the OP, but I like Hugo better than Gatsby as far as static site generators go. I think Hugo is easier to use and is a lot faster at generating sites. Gatsby does more than that, so it may be a good choice when you need something more than a static site generator; however, if I’m going to have to dick around with programming anyway I’d rather work with anything other than Node/JavaScript.
EDIT: I forgot to mention Zola, which I like quite well as far as static site generators go. It doesn’t have the support for multilingual sites that Hugo does, but its templating is much nicer, I think.
May I know why you don't like it and what alternatives you will recommend (if any)? I am considering Gatsby for building a site.