Re:How Firebase Interviewed Software Engineers
by davinic on Thursday September 26, 2019 @03:47PM
(#21084756)
I would, because interviews require someone from the other organization to be there. Time is a valuable resource, and as long as the employer is showing their commitment, I have no problem reciprocating. Skin in the game is the key.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Firebase Interviewed Software Engineers
by twic on Thursday September 26, 2019 @06:58PM
(#21086523)
Why does "skin in the game" matter? Why is that a useful signal about whether this company will be a good employer or not?
Re:How Firebase Interviewed Software Engineers
by Doxin on Friday September 27, 2019 @04:04AM
(#21089554)
It's not a useful signal about if they are a good employer, but it is a good signal for how likely they are to hire you: asking everyone who applies to take several hours out of their life to do your test is free. Having someone from your team interview them for several hours very much is not so you'll be more careful selecting candidates you might actually hire instead of just taking a shotgun approach.
Re:How Firebase Interviewed Software Engineers
by ProZsolt on Friday September 27, 2019 @07:22AM
(#21090648)
For me it's a useful signal, it means they value my time equally as theirs.
I'm happy to do the take-home test after the onsite one when they only testing that I really know what I said I know but I'm at the finish line.
A lot of companies require it right after the phone screening(usually with an HR person who knows nothing). I burned myself that way before. After finishing the take home test on the on site interview after 5 minutes it was clear they were looking for an ops person advertised as DevOps.