Re:Four Years in Startups
by nilkanthjp on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @07:15PM
(#21065718)
The companies, locations, and people referenced in this article are so thinly veiled I don't understand why they'd try to keep them anonymous at all?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I don't think they're claiming to actually anonymize them. Seems like it's just a stylistic choice to not affirmatively identify them.
Re:Four Years in Startups
by john-radio on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @09:52AM
(#21070752)
And avoiding a potential libel suit.
It's only libel if it isn't true.
To save the rest of you some trouble, the startups are Oyster ("e-books"), Mixpanel ("big data"), and Github ("open source").
Re:Four Years in Startups
by ambivalents on Friday September 27, 2019 @02:47PM
(#21095056)
While it was probably a legal decision, I actually liked how it worked on an artistic level. As a reader I was trying to piece it together myself. And it also left a feeling of, 'well, this is a specific company she is talking about, but at the same time could easily apply to dozens of others in the industry.'
Re:Four Years in Startups
by john_moscow on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @07:40PM
(#21065929)
So they can't sue back.
Re:Four Years in Startups
by nilkanthjp on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @10:58PM
(#21067174)
Ah yes, the technicalities of our wonderful justice system.