News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges... by ergothus on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @09:50AM (#21060103)
> They've had 3 years to act. Why 2 more weeks is so critical isn't actually all that obvious in the big picture.

When you dont have agreement on what to do and a deadline is looming, it seems obvious that, however much it should NOT have been needed, it is in fact critical.

You arent chopping 5 weeks off of a 3 year period, you're chopping 5 weeks off of an 8 week period.

Re:Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges... by mytailorisrich on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @01:15PM (#21062396)
They were adding 3 weeks to a 2 week suspension that was planned for party conferences. This is after the 5 week summer recess which they took as usual.

This is really about playing politics against Johnson and the government, not an actual outrage. Of course the government was doing the same by prorogating.