Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by jmnicolas on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @04:10AM
(#21057658)
90% of Reddit videos are unwatchable for me : they start OK then the quality is downgraded to something unwatchable and there's nothing I can do about it.
I even tried to download them with youtube-dl but it doesn't work.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by purple_ducks on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @06:50AM
(#21058520)
100% agreed. The initial buffering time on them is ridiculous. I've started uploading to streamable and just posting that link rather than upload video straight to reddit.
Makes me wonder in how many other [recursive] ways progress is held back by a lack of it.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by 1337shadow on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @09:32AM
(#21059925)
In 2010 I was 24 yr old and built a myspace clone SaaS with music and video hosting with everything it implies: large uploads, background jobs, compiling an nginx patch to support range requests, ajax to have videos and music playing while browser, with Django on a 20 bucks/month server.
If you're not convinced I don't know what will.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by simmanian on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @08:03PM
(#21066116)
I think the point is, with your Django approach, you'll be stuck doing ops work 9-5 once you start getting customers, whereas with serverless you can spend the time to do more feature dev work.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by 1337shadow on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @08:35PM
(#21066350)
Not quite sure about that, nowadays I require a couple of 20 bucks/month servers to have one CI/staging and one training/production deployments. I'm at the point where I practice CD as in "deploy each git-push to branchname.ci.example.com and run cypress on it" and still am able to deliver in half a day what the customer would expect to happen in two weeks.
And of course, baremetal provides a much better ROI than VMs/VPS/<insert glorified chroot/jail here>.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by simmanian on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @04:19PM
(#21074885)
You seem to have gotten your deployments down and I really think that's good. In my own experience, though, managing your own infra always works well until it doesn't anymore. And when it stops working well, it crashes and burns and sucks up all the time. Going with managed services like serverless helps to get around that.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by holler on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @12:01PM
(#21061570)
that sounds cool, what happened to it? that'd be a fun project to work on today :)
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by 1337shadow on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @08:29PM
(#21066294)
I just had no marketing, no partner for that, but I could rebuild that a similar time frame if only I had a plan to make profit out of it. Made it into a local newspapers but that's was the beginning and the end.
It's from the times where I was finding musicians in the streets to pay me 50 bucks per website and hosted them on grsecurity hardened gentoo ... which I don't practice at that cost anymore of course.
https://www.charentelibre.fr/2010/02/09/article-5-internet-a...
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by panpanna on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @07:03AM
(#21058597)
If Reddit video is the poster child then serverless is in big trouble.
That thing almost never works.
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by StellarTabi on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @11:34PM
(#21067354)
They've already ruined React!
(If Reddit’s video hosting being built and operated on a serverless stack by a single a engineer won’t convince you, I don’t know what will.)