Re:Sanders wants to replace credit reporting companies with ...
by asabjorn on Monday September 23, 2019 @01:24PM
(#21051111)
As I stated the unbanked are likely to be very old or poor so that use government services that require an ID. For instance, they rely on food stamps or Medicaid or social security. A large part of this 6.5% and the cohort you talk about therefor has an ID.
The reason why I think so is that people that are not poor can not lead their lives without a bank account due to the essentials for a non poor life requiring a bank account.
Re:Sanders wants to replace credit reporting companies with ...
by codyb on Monday September 23, 2019 @09:22PM
(#21055542)
This is my last comment. The Republicans would much prefer to prevent or make it harder to vote for 2%, 1%, whatever.
They don’t care about voter fraud. At all.
They care about adding enough shit together that they can win elections.
That is all they care about.
It is not in good faith. It is not about protecting the sanctity of elections.
It is about the opposite. They’ve never been able to show that voter fraud has ever affected an election.
They’re in it because even shaving a percentage of people from voting Democrat is worth it for them.
That is it. That’s the only reason.
Goodbye.
Instituting the voter ID law makes it harder for 6.5% of people that rarely vote for Republicans to vote to prevent 0.000X% of votes cast fraudulently each election.
Do you get it now?