News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by monocasa on Friday September 20, 2019 @10:31PM (#21033128)
Literally some of the most influential journalism of all time has been sourced from anonymous informants that weren't vetted by third parties. We didn't find out who deep throat was until over thirty years later, after he was in a nursing home with dementia.

Remember that anonymous doesn't mean unvetted.

And that leak was over literally millions of lives, so it's not like an intelligence arm of a Nation state doing its job in peace time is so more serious that the standards are higher.

Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by nickpsecurity on Friday September 20, 2019 @10:43PM (#21033162)
Didn't Deep Throat's testimony activate a government response indicating it was probably true? Or did everyone involved act like they were full of it? Honestly, I can't remember what I read and I wasn't from that time either.

Anonymous certainly doesn't mean unvetted. We should have something come out of the stories if something big is going on, though. If we don't, we have no reason to believe them if the source has other screwups on their record.