News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Explanation of the state of uBlock Origin and other block... by littlestymaar on Friday September 20, 2019 @01:07PM (#21028947)
> One advantage this technique provides over ad blocking is that there's no data to be phoned back home. […] But from a privacy perspective, I personally much prefer this technique.

Are you suggesting uBO is sending data “back home”? It doesn't, and this comment is borderline FUD.

Re:Explanation of the state of uBlock Origin and other block... by dmix on Friday September 20, 2019 @01:16PM (#21029044)
If only everyone used uBlock instead of the countless other scammy adblockers with millions of active users, which do not take privacy nearly as seriously. OP also never mentioned uBlock specifically, so I wouldn't be so quick to call it FUD.

Whether or not this is a sufficient solution is one thing, but there are some legitimate problems with the current state of adblocking. Being able to provide a similar solution in a far more limited fashion would be a good thing for users.

Re:Explanation of the state of uBlock Origin and other block... by loeg on Friday September 20, 2019 @08:41PM (#21032698)
Nah, uBO is fantastic. The problem is nearly all other purported adblockers. Some of them are ok/mediocre; most (like most browser extensions) are just outright crap or malware.

The moral dilemma here seems to be that Google is unwilling to privilege a good-citizen adblocker like uBO over other extensions; they're an ad company and any explicit step towards promoting an adblocker probably is hard to explain at shareholder meetings, even if the engineers want to.

Re:Explanation of the state of uBlock Origin and other block... by dpkonofa on Friday September 20, 2019 @05:33PM (#21031521)
They never suggested anything of the sort. That being said, for every uBO that doesn't send that data back home, there are 1000s of "ad-blockers" that do exactly that.