Re:Closing the gap: cross-language LTO between Rust and C/C++
by pjmlp on Friday September 20, 2019 @03:36AM
(#21024094)
You forgot about COM/UWP, which has taken the role originally though for .NET on Longhorn.
The whole point of UWP was to improve COM to make it even better for language interop, increasing the kind of language features that can get exposed as COM libraries.
Also the number one reason that if Rust wants to succeed as system language on Windows it needs to have first class support for COM/UWP.
The whole point of UWP was to improve COM to make it even better for language interop, increasing the kind of language features that can get exposed as COM libraries.
Also the number one reason that if Rust wants to succeed as system language on Windows it needs to have first class support for COM/UWP.