News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silicon Valley is terrified of California’s privacy law by oarabbus_ on Thursday September 19, 2019 @06:11PM (#21021242)
>so facebook can switch to subsciption only

sure, if it wanted to fall out of the fortune 500.

Re:Silicon Valley is terrified of California’s privacy law by Marsymars on Thursday September 19, 2019 @09:33PM (#21022517)
If Facebook can't convince its users that its service is worth paying an average of $2.5 per year for, I don't think it really deserves to remain in the Fortune 500.
Re:Silicon Valley is terrified of California’s privacy law by mokus on Thursday September 19, 2019 @11:52PM (#21023208)
Where does $2.5/year come from? Other comments in this discussion have suggested that it would be more like $120/year in the US, or $25/year for a global average
Re:Silicon Valley is terrified of California’s privacy law by Marsymars on Friday September 20, 2019 @12:40AM (#21023376)
$2.5/year from each of their monthly active users would be sufficient to keep Facebook in the Fortune 500. (As referenced in the post I was replying to.)

(Tangentially, they would have to cut costs to remain profitable, but I figure it should be possible for 6k employees to maintain a set of services that people are willing to pay $2.5/year for.)