Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review
by lern_too_spel on Friday September 20, 2019 @01:30AM
(#21023551)
The article links to a few concrete examples. You'll have to use the Wayback Machine to access them.
No it doesn’t. It contains a link to an article about supposed “whitelisting” and one about supposedly giving WaPo and exclusive interview in retaliation to the NYT’s critical reporting. These are both the exact opposite of the blacklisting the article asserts exists. Then it links to an article about blacklisting but dismissed it as inaccurate. So there’s nothing linked about actual blacklisting examples by Apple unless I’ve missed something. Elgan doesn’t even say why he is blacklisted.
Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review
by lern_too_spel on Saturday September 21, 2019 @03:06PM
(#21037243)
This article is about somebody who got a loaner, which means they are specifically whitelisted as my article's link says, which means that they are uncritical of Apple products. I don't know why you are hung up on blacklisting specifically as I have not mentioned that, only that prelaunch reviews of Apple products are not credible.
Because this comment chain, including your original reply, was about blacklisting critical reviewers.
Also because the article you linked is about blacklisting.
Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review
by lern_too_spel on Sunday September 22, 2019 @11:46AM
(#21041884)
It is also about whitelisting, which is the relevant section for this review ("an early review of an Apple product"). I never mentioned the term "blacklisting" until you brought it up.
Now that we have that out of the way, do you agree that early reviews of Apple products can only be done by reviewers that Apple considers favorable?
I can believe that Apple might do this (especially since he also cites openly breaking rules by doing things like live-streaming when it’s been explicitly forbidden) but this article doesn’t convince me it’s happening or educate me on how much of a problem it really is.