Was he though? It seems to me that all that Stallman said was lets please figure out exactly what Minsky did.

That's taking what he said way out of context.

The line of Stallman apologists over the years is almost as long as Epstein’s.

When did he do that?

The full e-mail thread is at the bottom of this article, in an awfully-formatted little PDF viewer. I suggest full-screening.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-sci...

I read the full thread, and I didn't see anything that I would consider "defending rape". It seemed pretty clear that he thinks Epstein was a bad person and that what happened to Giuffre is not good. The closest thing to defending rape is him trying to give Minsky the benefit of the doubt (e.g. stating that Minksky may not have known Giuffre's age or situation, and IIRC in her deposition she was careful to avoid saying whether or not she actually had sex with Minsky, only that Epstein wanted her to).

See page 7, where he argues that sex with a minor should not be considered rape.

Because it is not the definition of rape.

Are sexually mature underage people prepubescent children now? It's ridiculous that people continue to willfully conflate the two just because they want to continue to have the moral high ground.

Thursday

> Thrusday

I guess I'm not up to speed and haven't read everything he said, can you quote his exact words he said on Thrusday that led you to conclude he was "Defending the rape of trafficked children"?

Stallman has just said he's having to resign after being accused over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations, is this an example of a mischaracterization of what he said or did he really say he defended raping trafficked children?