Re:Microsoft President: Democracy Is At Stake. Regulate Big ...
by MichaelMoser123 on Saturday September 14, 2019 @10:08AM
(#20970862)
I think because democracy also implies a separation of powers, so that you have the players watching each other in order to prevent any player from becoming too strong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft President: Democracy Is At Stake. Regulate Big ...
by PorterDuff on Saturday September 14, 2019 @11:31AM
(#20971412)
Again, there's a Soviet counterexample of army/party/intelligence service.
Even in the case of a dictatorial and lifetime head of state, separation of powers is baked into the cake by groups with common interests, sometimes organically, sometimes on purpose.
Re:Microsoft President: Democracy Is At Stake. Regulate Big ...
by MichaelMoser123 on Saturday September 14, 2019 @12:41PM
(#20971928)
Seperation of powers is necessary but not sufficient requirement for maintaining democracy. In classical Athens they didn't have that, so modern philosophers take pride that we do have it.
Of course any sufficiently big organization does have competing departments with conflicting agengas, but also there are nuances.