>Oddly, Epstein also claimed to do all the investing by himself while his 150 employees all worked in the back office — which Kass says reminds him of Madoff’s cover story. Though it now appears that Epstein had many fewer employees than he claimed
What was almost certainly happening was that his hedge fund was a front for blackmailing people (after they had sex with his underage sex slaves).
It's also interesting to note that his client list has still somehow not leaked. Everyone on there is probably a (wealthy/powerful) pedo.
https://nypost.com/2019/08/20/ex-bill-gates-adviser-shocked-...
Gates himself has a lot to answer for. The MIT emails show Epstein funneling $2M from Gates to Media Lab. He also flew on Epstein's jet to Florida and hasn't answered why.
But I sense this whole thing is yielding fruit in other ways. Reddit threads on the front page (and allowed to stay on the front page; this thread on HN has now been flagged I see) in normal subreddits are absolutely full of overwhelming conspiratorial comments, the nature of which the hivemind would previously have downvoted into oblivion, because as we all know conspiracies like this are "always" crazy lies, due to the fact that is it "literally impossible" for that many people to keep their mouths shut.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/shocking-origins-jeffrey-epste...
CIA, Mossad and the mafia are all covered. Whitney Webb did a really amazing job researching all of this.
it's not an assertion then, it's a hypothesis. in any case, i think you may have misunderstood what i was tring to say: imagine if i'd said: "i've seen evidence that hillary clinton reports to the chinese/korean government. no proof, but still". it says nothing, doesn't mention the evidence i've seen, and yet seems to imply something "wrong".
i'm calling it out, because it it encourages belief without evidence. it's insidious.
I want to see if the allegations are true and I support further investigation to bring all the details to light, because they are quite alarming. I don't support any narrative other than the truth.
I posted out of curiosity, because I wanted to see if others could contribute more to the discussion.
Meanwhile you have people that are flagging stories like this for an unknown reason, which is frustrating.
1. This Harvard statement. "Money's gone, too bad".
2. MIT President Rafael Reif admitted to signing an Epstein thank you note and attending a meeting discussing Epstein's contributions. He also threw his whole staff under the bus.
3. Reid Hoffman admitted to arranging meetings with Epstein on Joi Ito's request. He shockingly threw Ito and unshockingly MIT under the bus.
[2] https://news.mit.edu/2019/letter-regarding-jeffrey-epstein-a...
[3] https://www.axios.com/reid-hoffman-jeffrey-epstein-mit-donat...
EDIT:
This submission is now [flagged]. There's no flame war going on in here to sink it so not sure why it would be removed.