News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by bryanlarsen on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @01:08PM (#20942358)
Feeding 11 billion people where a large portion of those people can only afford to spend $2/day on food? Very difficult.

Feeding 11 billion people where everybody can spend $100/day on food? Very simple. If necessary (and it's not), we could build vast quantities of greenhouses and get orders of magnitude improvements in calories per acre.

The environmental consequences of such high-intensity farming is another issue, of course.

Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by AndrewGaspar on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @01:12PM (#20942423)
This is kind of a tail wagging the dog argument. If only everybody was rich then there wouldn't be any resource scarcity!
Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by nategri on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @01:52PM (#20942843)
To badly paraphrase Willian Gibson: the richness is already here, it's just not evenly distributed yet.
Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by dominotw on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @02:24PM (#20943162)
> the richness is already here

how do we know this?

Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by cryptoz on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @01:53PM (#20942852)
> The environmental consequences of such high-intensity farming is another issue, of course.

It's not another issue, it's the same issue. We're in this mess in the first place because nobody cares to price in the costs of the equation over time. We all want to eat for like a century, right? So why make price estimates that only work for ~10-20 years of unsustainable-climate-change-driving industry and then collapse when the climate changes and farming has to change too?

Pricing the costs into the equation from the start makes your "very simple" point become still, "quite complex".

The environment changing is a key fact in the pricing of things, and ignore-the-environment-in-first-estimates trope is a major flaw in how we think about problems.

Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by PeterStuer on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @02:33PM (#20943249)
Now if only there was a way to create $1.000.000.000.000.000 at the push of a single button ... Understanding the true meaning and implications of a fiduciary currency should be a mandatory part of education, but I guess then we would have a revolution on our hands.
Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by raphaelj on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @05:33PM (#20944977)
Creating a such amount of money will just create inflation. You'll end up with exactly as much purchasing power, is not less.
Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by PeterStuer on Thursday September 12, 2019 @04:20AM (#20949200)
The whole point is that 'money' has no intrinsic value. It is merely a proxy we use for prioritization. The current system prioritizes adding a 67'th Ferrari to the collection of Mr. Big, over clothing/feeding/healthcare for people that do lack the basics.

Inflation is not caused by the creation of money itself. If it were, the USD would be resembling the Zimbabwean dollar after all the 'Quantitative Easing'.

For inflation to occur you have to put the fresh currency into the hands of those that are actually going to spend it on unmet needs for which there is an inelastic offering, meaning you can not or choose not just produce more to meet the demand.

Giving free new money to Mss. Rich will not suddenly inflate the bread price, as her demand for breads was met long ago. It might drive up the stockmarket as she is dumping cash on speculation or buying shares back in her own companies, or drive up prices of real-estate for speculation etc.

Re:In the Netherlands, a group of scientists is working on f... by jnurmine on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @01:41PM (#20942735)
It's not only the greenhouses, it's the logistics of getting the food from the greenhouse to the mouth.