News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by hayksaakian on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @02:13AM (#20937060)
Your case seems to be a consequence of how healthcare works in America (insurance).

For those of us lucky enough to be in good health, the "Gig economy" as-described would be just fine.

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by cheriot on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @02:18AM (#20937085)
> For those of us lucky enough to be in good health

It's a common refrain that only people with health problems need health care, but that's just not true. Risk has a price. That's why health care and life insurance for healthy people is not free. Good health just makes it easier to pretend that risk isn't there.

Tying health care to employment is a historical accident long overdue for change.

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by WalterBright on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @06:24AM (#20938374)
> Tying health care to employment is a historical accident long overdue for change.

Ironically, it came about because of wage freezes imposed by the government during WW2. Employers had to find something to offer to attract workers, and employer-paid insurance did the trick.

The trap, though, was that employer paid insurance was paid with pre-tax dollars, while if you bought it yourself you'd pay in post-tax dollars, making it far more expensive.

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by erik_seaberg on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @07:32PM (#20945914)
Also adverse selection. Healthy people are tempted to only pay for catastrophic or no coverage, so a lot of individual policy buyers are sicker than the average employee in a group policy (because large companies cover everyone).
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by cheriot on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @03:53PM (#20944000)
That's an interesting tidbit of history. Thanks
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by moduspol on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @08:12AM (#20939130)
> Tying health care to employment is a historical accident long overdue for change.

This, 100%. It wouldn't solve everything, but it'd be a huge positive step to roll back tax incentives that encourage this.

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by fiblye on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @03:05AM (#20937332)
And good drivers can save lots of cash and worries by simply not getting car insurance.

Health insurance’s main alleged draw is that shit happens when you least expect it, and you can avoid the massive costs when the unexpected happens (accidents, cancer, botulism, whatever). Unfortunately, someone in America found out you can charge monthly fees for health insurance while still making the person pay massive amounts themselves. Just promise they’ll pay a slightly less massive amount.

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by hdfbdtbcdg on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @07:30AM (#20938822)
> And good drivers can save lots of cash and worries by simply not getting car insurance.

Only if they are rich enough to post a rather large bond.

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by michaelmrose on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @03:19AM (#20937398)
Good health is a temporary condition. Everyone eventually craps out. If you only buy health insurance when you are old and or sick then you wont be able to afford it when you need it.
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by ivanhoe on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @03:35AM (#20937464)
Your health is of very little significance if you get in a traffic accident, for instance. Or you fall and break something. Or get hurt in training. Or get bitten by lyme disease carrying tick. Etc...
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by SirHound on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @02:18AM (#20937092)
You have no idea when that good luck will run out