News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iPhone 11 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max by z5h on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @03:16PM (#20932297)
I was countering your claim that these were spec bumps. Now we're instead having a discussion about Android phones and Animojis?

I can't keep track.

Re:iPhone 11 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max by ehsankia on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @04:51PM (#20933571)
I categorize announcements in two buckets:

1. Spec bumps: These are mostly invisible to the consumer, it just gives them a phone that's slightly faster or lasts longer. Faster matrix multiply falls into this category.

2. Features: These are actual changes the user can see and interact with. I named a few examples, both on software (animoji/sound focus) and hardware (face unlock/soli) side.

This presentation had almost none of the latter, other than Dark Mode. I'm not sure why that statement is so hard to understand. None of the stuff you named were really features. No one goes to the store to buy the phone with the slightly faster cpu or better matrix multiplies.

Re:iPhone 11 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max by nanoservices on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @03:24PM (#20932431)
> Now we're instead having a discussion about Android phones and Animojis?

Because you & apple during the presentation made is sound like computational photography in phones was something ground breaking and never before seen. Its been in the Pixel phone for years.

Re:iPhone 11 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max by colejohnson66 on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @03:55PM (#20932913)
No one said it was new. They said it was big for Apple. Yes, Apple is always behind their competitors in many things, but that’s not why people buy Apple.