That's from the article. The author of that post has had virtually all of his work funded by the oil industry.

That doesn't make him wrong, but it does raise questions. There are also few who agree with his stance.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/02/26/uds-david-leg...

Fully examining arguments against Legates would be a lot of work, but here's a discussion of his most recent paper.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97...

That has virtually nothing about his claims, just his funding. And while the source of funding is important, I'd love to see an analysis of the actual claims/science.

Oops, my mistake. I meant to link two articles, left off the second. This is the one I was referring to with my final para. Will edit my comment above if I can

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97...

Many thanks :)