Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by jbarberu on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:17AM
(#20927776)
I don't understand why the term ride-sharing is even used when talking about Uber and Lyft. Has anyone ever gone with a driver who wasn't just driving an unlicensed cab? Or is it referring to multiple riders sharing one car?
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by tenebrisalietum on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @11:22AM
(#20929204)
All the Ubers/Lyfts I've used (between 30 and 40 as rough estimate) are people in what looks like their own cars. There's never been any cab insignia anywhere on them.
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by rockinghigh on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @08:27AM
(#20927423)
If all drivers are employees and all show up to work at 10AM when there is little demand, you can’t pay all of them minimum wage. The companies would have to predict demand and ask just enough driver employees to match the demand.
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by ergothus on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:32AM
(#20927934)
Why does "employee" equate to "show up at 10AM" ? Why cant they work the same hours and style they do now, but with the title of "employee"?
That's an honest question, I know employment laws are complex and likely didnt include these concepts, but I'm also interested in facts over speculation.
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by birdyrooster on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:50AM
(#20928129)
You are correct. They could. This comes down to offering a minimum income to people who work for Uber and Lyft and giving them benefits that they would otherwise never qualify for like paid health insurance.
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by birdyrooster on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:48AM
(#20928114)
Then why am I paying surge pricing at times of high demand or low supply? Don’t you think that companies can profit share with their employees on that price differential?
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by conanbatt on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @07:58AM
(#20927222)
I think california taxpayers should be treated fairly. Amazing how rent in SF is higher than what these drivers make, and the state solution is to make sure they pay more taxes.
Re:Uber, Lyft Poised to Lose Fight Against CA Bill to Label ...
by Traubenfuchs on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @05:23AM
(#20926441)
With the kind of freelancing you are probably referencing, the deal is that you get a much higher hourly rate with the drawback that you have less long term job security and need to actively manage your engagements, contracts, taxes, etc.
Ride sharing drivers usually get less money than "normal" drivers, to the point where legislators around the world want to protect them.
That's an honest question, I know employment laws are complex and likely didnt include these concepts, but I'm also interested in facts over speculation.
Ride sharing drivers usually get less money than "normal" drivers, to the point where legislators around the world want to protect them.